It thus appears that, when the Circuit Court reacts to the new dispue, it might have to provide its own interpretation of what the Supreme Court's action in 2010 meant. It could, however, rule based only on its understanding of what local court rules allow, although that seems less likely. There is also an issue of whether the Circuit Court should deal itself with this new dispute, or refer it back to the District Court, where the videotape was made and is now technically stored. The Proponent 8 backers argued Thursday, however, that the full record of the case is now before the Circuit Court, as part of the appeal process, so the District Court has at least temporarily lost any power to issue orders in it. Given the strength of the views on each side of this broadcast-or-not controversy, it would not be at all surprising if the issue would wind up back in the Supreme Court, for the Justices to say what the majority had intended when it stopped the trial broadcast.